High glycaemic burden associated with HCC development and fibrosis progression in patients with CHB + T2D

08 Nov 2022 bySarah Cheung
High glycaemic burden associated with HCC
development and fifibrosis progression
in patients with CHB + T2DHigh glycaemic burden associated with HCC development and fifibrosis progression in patients with CHB + T2D

High glycaemic burden is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development and fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) (CHB + T2D), researchers from the University of Hong Kong (HKU) have reported.

The findings suggest that glycaemic control is a modifiable risk factor for hepatic complications in patients with CHB + T2D. “For those living with hepatitis B, good diabetes control also protects the liver,” said co-corresponding author, Professor Walter Seto of the Department of Medicine, HKU.

In this study, the researchers analyzed data from a prospective transient elastography (TE) database of Chinese adults with CHB who had HBsAg positivity for >6 months. Patients with concomitant T2D were those with fasting glucose (FG) ≥7.0 mmol/L, HbA1c ≥6.5 percent or on antidiabetic medications. [Hepatology 2022;doi:10.1002/hep.32716]

The study cohort included 2,330 patients with CHB (mean age, 54.6 years; male, 55.5 percent; on antivirals, 57.9 percent), 671 (28.8 percent) of whom also had T2D (mean age, 61.9; male, 65.6 percent; on antiviral, 62.9 percent). Among patients with CHB + T2D, the mean duration of T2D was 7.2 years, the mean HbA1c was 7.2 percent, and the proportion of time reaching HbA1c target (HbA1c-TRT) was 88 percent. Most patients with CHB + T2D (93.4 percent) received ≥1 antidiabetic medication.

At a median follow-up of 5.9 years, the overall annual incidence of HCC was 0.69 percent. In the overall cohort, T2D was independently associated with an increased risk of HCC (hazard ratio [HR], 2.080; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.343–3.22; p=0.001). CHB patients with T2D had a higher cumulative HCC incidence vs those without T2D (4.92 percent vs 3.74 percent; log-rank p=0.001).

After propensity–score matching (CHB + T2D, n=637; CHB without T2D, n=1,274), multivariable analysis showed that HCC risk was predicted by T2D-specific factors, including duration of T2D (HR, 1.107; 95 percent CI, 1.023–1.198), mean HbA1c (HR, 1.851; 95 percent CI, 1.026–3.339) and HbA1c-TRT (HR, 0.978; 95 percent CI, 0.957–0.999).

However, in univariable analysis, there was no significant association of HCC development with HbA1c variability (standard deviation of serial HbA1c values [HbA1c-SD]: HR, 1.373; 95 percent CI, 0.821–2.297; ratio of SD to mean HbA1c: HR, 1.026; 95 percent CI, 0.983–1.071; adjusted HbA1c-SD: HR, 1.057; 95 percent CI, 0.845–2.687), FG (HR, 1.084; 95 percent CI, 0.929–1.265) and baseline HbA1c (HR, 1.248; 95 percent CI, 0.942–1.654).

Fibrosis progression occurred in 537 of 1,399 (38.4 percent) patients with CHB and valid 3-year TE, and 373 of 671 (55.6 percent) patients with CHB + T2D and paired TE. T2D was also an independent factor for fibrosis progression (odds ratio [OR], 4.305; 95 percent CI, 3.416–5.424, p<0.001).

Multivariable analysis revealed that duration of T2D (OR, 1.044; 95 percent CI, 1.005–1.085), mean HbA1c (OR, 1.220; 95 percent CI, 1.005–1.481), HbA1c-TRT (OR, 0.993; 95 percent CI, 0.988–0.999), baseline FG (OR, 1.109; 95 percent CI, 1.010–1.218) and baseline HbA1c (OR, 1.247; 95 percent CI, 1.050–1.480) were associated with the risk of fibrosis progression at 3 years.

“[HCC development in CHB] is not all about the virus,” commented Dr Jachs of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, and Dr Tillmann of the East Carolina University, US, in an accompanying editorial. “This study reminds us that crucial risk factors for HCC, especially those that are modifiable, need to be addressed in patients [with CHB].” [Hepatology 2022;doi:10.1002/hep.32798]