Management of Pregnant Women with Obesity

19 Dec 2020 byDr. Florrie Nga Yui Yu, Dr. Kwok-Yin Leung
Management of Pregnant Women with Obesity
ABSTRACT
Maternal obesity is a growing health problem that is associated with obstetric and perinatal risks as well as development of obesity and metabolic disorders in offspring. All pregnant women with obesity should be counselled regarding these risks. Reducing obesity before pregnancy is the most effective way to diminish these risks as weight management during pregnancy is a challenge. Proper antepartum, intrapartum, intraoperative, postoperative, and postpartum management are required to reduce adverse maternal-foetal outcomes. Current recommendations on gestational weight gain (GWG) goals, nutrient and vitamin supplements, screening for medical disorders and foetal abnormalities, and management of labour are highlighted in this article. Practice advice on overcoming technical difficulties associated with obesity are discussed.

INTRODUCTION
Over the past 40 years, there has been an increase in the worldwide prevalence of obesity by nearly three times.1 Maternal obesity is associated with adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes (Tables 1 and 2),2-12 and the likelihood of childhood obesity and metabolic syndrome.13 Excessive amounts of adipose tissue can impair vascular, metabolic, and inflammatory pathways in multiple organs. Maternal hormone levels, altered gene expression, and foetal epigenetic modification may also be altered.14 Perinatal risks are further enhanced by obesity-associated comorbidities. In this article, we will discuss the current recommendations on the pre-pregnancy, antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum management with a view to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Pre-pregnancy counselling
Obesity can affect reproductive function by affecting oocyte development and endometrial gene expression.15 In early pregnancy, the high concentrations of insulin in women with obesity can cause an alteration of maternal and placental gene expression in relation to mitochondrial steroid hormone production and energy metabolism.16 Reducing obesity before pregnancy is the currently recommended and most effective way to reduce obstetric risks.

Weight loss by even 5% before pregnancy can be beneficial.14 Interventions include diet and exercise. Weight-reducing agents (eg, orlistat and liraglutide) should stop taking these before getting pregnant as these are not approved during pregnancy.17 Women who underwent bariatric surgery should be advised to avoid pregnancy for 12–18 months after surgery to reduce postoperative complications and foetal exposure to the rapid weight loss period.18

It is helpful to screen for comorbidities including chronic hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, cardiovascular disease, arrhythmias, osteoarthritis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic kidney disease, depression, and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).

Diagnosis
Maternal obesity is usually defined as a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m2 at the antenatal booking visit.1,14 Weight and height should be measured, as self-reported data may be inaccurate. While BMI correlates well with body fat mass in non-pregnant women, the correlation is not the same in pregnant women because of the significant increase in total body water.19

Pregnant women with obesity should be counselled about the medical and foetal risks (Tables 1 and 2),2-12 and the adverse effects of excessive weight gain. Insulin resistance increases with gestation, and triggers subclinical metabolic dysfunction that progresses to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pre-eclampsia, and macrosomia.14




Weight management during pregnancy
The impact of weight reduction may be limited during vs prior to pregnancy. Previous randomized trials showed that the use of metformin during pregnancy can reduce GWG,20-21 but not GDM, large-for-gestational-age foetuses, or adverse neonatal outcomes. Besides, inadequate weight gain is associated with the risk of small-for-gestational-age infants.14

It is difficult to define optimal GWG such that the foetus can develop and grow optimally. Furthermore, optimal GWG may differ with ethnicities and population.25 According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM), pregnant women with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 are advised to gain 4.96–9.0 kg.22 An additional 100 kilocalories (kcal)/day and 300 kcal/day are required before and after 20 weeks of gestation, respectively.23 Women with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 can gain less weight without increasing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, while close foetal monitoring is required.24 Hence, repeated weight measurements during pregnancy is required for women with obesity.

Healthy diet options include low-glycaemic load or low-calorie diet. Advice can be sought from a dietician or a behaviour health counsellor, if necessary. Regular physical activity can protect against excessive GWG, hypertension, GDM, and macrosomia without increasing the risk of preterm birth.26 Regular daily exercise with a gradual increase in moderate-intensity physical activity up to a goal of 30 minutes should be encouraged depending on their medical status, heart rate, comfort, and ability.17 Walking, which can improve aerobic capacity, is preferred by most women; women with back or joint pain may need specific support.

Obesity is associated with vitamin D and iron deficiency, which require adequate supplementation.17 Daily supplementation of elemental calcium 1.5–2.0 g can reduce the risk of gestational hypertension.17 Daily periconceptual supplementation with folic acid 5 mg/day is recommended to reduce the risk of neural tube defects in the foetus.27 Despite the altered microbiome in women with obesity, there is insufficient evidence to recommend probiotic or omega-3 supplementation.17

Maternal assessment and prevention
Screening for OSA in pregnant women with obesity has been suggested. OSA can lead to reduced airflow and hypoxaemia, which can be exacerbated during pregnancy. OSA is also associated with increased risk of pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, cardiomyopathy, GDM, and death.28

The risk of gestational hypertension can be reduced by giving low-dose aspirin (75–162 mg/day) prior to 16 weeks of gestation, if additional risk factors are present.29 A recent multicentre trial has shown that a dose of 150 mg/day of aspirin can reduce preterm pre-eclampsia by >60% in women at high risk.30

Evidence has shown that the insulin precursor myo-inositol reduced the risk of GDM.32 As such, early screening for GDM and retest at 24–28 weeks have been recommended. However, early screening reportedly did not reduce the composite perinatal outcome,31 hence the need for further studies.

Down syndrome screening
Increased maternal BMI is associated with a lower likelihood of prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome,33 and a higher failure rate for measuring the nuchal translucency. Transvaginal scan may reduce the failure rate.

Obesity is associated with a higher failure rate for noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) with cell-free DNA, up to around 25%, because of a higher proportion of low foetal fraction (FF) <4% in maternal plasma.34 This low FF is probably due to an increase in maternal cell-free DNA contribution resulting from adipocyte inflammation and necrosis.34 Options include redrawing maternal blood at a later gestational age, scheduling initial NIPT at a later gestational age, or using serum integrated screening.

Morphology scan
Obesity reduces the odds of detecting congenital anomalies because it reduces the quality of ultrasound images and the likelihood of completing an adequate morphology scan.35 In particular, visualization of the foetal heart, spine, face, extremities, and genitalia is impaired.

Useful tips are listed in Table 3.35 Performing a morphology scan at 22–24 weeks instead of 18–20 weeks may help in assessing foetal structures; however, this may not allow enough time for further investigations like karyotyping before 24 weeks’ gestation if a foetal anomaly is detected. An incomplete scan would warrant timely referral to a specialist. Foetal structures can be assessed by a vaginal scan at 13–16 weeks, albeit with limitations. Foetal magnetic resonance imaging is not used routinely because of its limited availability and cost.



Foetal monitoring
Accurate dating is important because maternal obesity is associated with a postponement of expected date of delivery by an ultrasound examination at 11–14 weeks’ gestation.36

Maternal obesity is associated with foetal macrosomia. Occasionally, foetal growth restriction (FGR) can result from nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery.37 Screening for abnormal foetal growth using serial ultrasound examinations is preferred because symphysial fundal height may overestimate macrosomia and underestimate FGR.28

Serial ultrasound examinations at 28, 32, and 36 weeks for foetal growth and pulsatile index (PI) of the maternal uterine artery are found to be useful to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes.38 When umbilical artery-PI, middle cerebral artery (MCA)-PI, and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) are used in screening for adverse pregnancy outcomes, appropriate adjustments should be made for BMI because BMI >90th percentile (>36.5 kg/m2) is associated with high MCA-PI and CPR.39 Customized growth curves, and using extrapolation of foetal growth parameters measured between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks to predict birth weight at term, have been proposed.

Given the potential effect of a thick abdominal wall on cardiotocography tracings,40 women with obesity are more likely to present with decreased foetal movement, which is associated with stillbirth and FGR.

Induction of labour
Increased risk of stillbirth associated with maternal obesity is probably related to several risk factors including placental disease, hypertension, infections, foetal or umbilical cord abnormalities, vena caval compression due to maternal supine sleep position, and OSA.2-10,41 Recent evidence suggests induction of labour (IOL) at 39–40 weeks rather than at 41 weeks because the former can reduce macrosomia, neonatal morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and severe maternal morbidity, and it is cost effective compared with the latter.28,42 For women with a BMI of ≥40 kg/m2, delivery before 38 weeks can reduce perinatal mortality.39 However, the results of failed IOL and reduction of shoulder dystocia are conflicting.42-43

Cervical ripening may require repeated doses rather than a single dose of prostaglandin E2.44 Mechanical ripening with a balloon catheter is an alternative.

Intrapartum monitoring
To avoid aortocaval compression, left lateral labouring position is preferred. Continuous electronic foetal monitoring is recommended for women with a BMI of >35 kg/m2. It may be difficult to monitor uterine contractions or foetal heart rate by manual palpation or with external cardiotocography because of a thick abdominal wall.40 Using intrauterine pressure catheter or foetal scalp electrode is an alternative but is invasive. Electrohysterography and abdominal foetal electrocardiography are new and noninvasive alternatives.

Labour dystocia
Obesity is associated with prolongation of the first stage of labour, higher incidence of labour dystocia, increased risk for Caesarean section.45 Progress of labour should be monitored, and early use of oxytocin has been proposed for slow progress. A higher dose of oxytocin is required to achieve the desired response.43

Despite conflicting evidence regarding the correlation between increasing BMI and increased risk of shoulder dystocia (relative risk, 1.29–2.7),46-47 the use of vaginal operative delivery should be done with caution.

Caesarean section
The increased risk of Caesarean section associated with maternal obesity may be attributable to antenatal complications (hypertensive disorders and macrosomia) and intrapartum complications (foetal heart rate or uterine contractility abnormalities and cephalopelvic disproportion).48 Compared with elective repeat Caesarean delivery, increasing BMI was associated with failed trial of labour after previous Caesarean delivery, greater composite morbidity, and neonatal injury; however, absolute morbidities were small.49

Increasing maternal BMI extends anaesthetic time, failure rate of regional anaesthesia, difficulties in epidural insertion, and endotracheal intubation.52 Antenatal consultation with an anaesthesiologist and early epidural insertion are recommended.53 Epidural top-up can reduce delay to skin incision.52 Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia can provide a more dense block and allow the flexibility of additional surgical time with a continuous epidural infusion. To avoid hypotension and foetal heart rate decelerations after epidural anaesthesia, adequate volume preloading should be given. To reduce the risk of aspiration, useful interventions include prophylactic epidural, histamine H2 antagonist, sodium citrate with citric acid, metoclopramide, and nothing by mouth during labour.53

For emergency Caesarean sections, increasing BMI prolongs patient-transportation time, anaesthetic preparation time, and skin incision to delivery interval, and thus the decision to delivery interval.50 To reduce difficulty with patient transfer, bariatric lifts, inflatable mattresses, and additional personnel are useful.

Because increasing BMI is associated with decreased maternal plasma and adipose cefazolin concentrations, cefazolin ≥2 g (without allergy) is usually given to reduce postoperative surgical site infection and other wound complications.

In general, the suprapubic transverse incision is the preferred incision to midline subumbilical incision for surgery of the lower abdomen because of decreased postoperative pain and wound dehiscence.51 In extreme obesity, a transverse infraumbilical or supraumbilical incision can offer straightforward access to the lower uterine segment. To facilitate surgical access or exposure, the panniculus can be tapped in a cephalad direction, using self-retaining retractors and long instruments.51 Moist area underneath the panniculus should be avoided because of the risk of wound infection and breakdown.51

Subcuticular closure of adipose layer can reduce wound complications.28 Ligation of large subcutaneous vessels and meticulous surgical technique are useful, but there is insufficient evidence to support the use of subcutaneous drains, negative pressure wound therapy, or a particular wound dressing.28 Keeping the area under the panniculus clean and dry is important.

The wound should be monitored closely for signs of complications including infection, hematomas, and disruption during and after hospitalization. To prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE), early mobilization and adequate hydration are recommended. Physical therapy to assist with ambulation and the use of appropriately fitted pneumatic compression devices are helpful. Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin can be used selectively in high-risk women including BMI ≥40 kg/m2 or two or more persisting risk factors.54

Postpartum
Breastfeeding can protect against childhood obesity. Women with obesity had higher risk of failure to initiate breastfeeding and delayed onset of lactogenesis because of limitations by larger breasts, flattened nipple due to postpartum oedema, associated medical complications, and an early separation of mother and child.55 Additional inpatient and ongoing outpatient support are required.

Women with obesity are less likely to use contraception.56 If there are no comorbidities, progestin-only contraceptives and intrauterine devices can be used, although the former is associated with weight gain and menstrual irregularities.57 Oestrogen-containing contraceptives should be avoided before 6 weeks postpartum in view of the additional risk factors for VTE.

Weight loss before a future pregnancy is the most effective intervention to improve medical comorbidities in women with obesity, and can decrease maternal and foetal risks.28 Behavioural approaches, physical activity, and diet are useful interventions.

Pre-pregnancy obesity, GWG, and postpartum weight retention increases the risk of maternal depression and anxiety.57 Health-related quality of life decreased initially, but returned to baseline within 3 months postpartum.58

CONCLUSION
Weight loss before pregnancy, rather than during pregnancy, is the most effective way to reduce obstetric risks associated with maternal obesity. All pregnant women with obesity should be counselled regarding these risks, optimal GWG, and nutrient and vitamin supplements. Screening for maternal disorders including GDM, pre-eclampsia, OSA, and foetal abnormalities (foetal aneuploidies, anomalies, and macrosomia) are required. A planned peripartum care is needed.

About the authors
Dr Florrie Nga Yui Yu is an Associate Consultant in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China. Conflict of interest: None.

Dr Kwok Yin Leung is an Honorary Consultant in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology at Gleneagles Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China. Conflict of interest: None.
REFERENCES
1.    World Health Organisation (WHO). Obesity and overweight. WHO 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Accessed 18 July 2020.
2.    Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:1175–1182.
3.    Leddy MA, Power ML, Schulkin J. The impact of maternal obesity on maternal and fetal health. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2008 Fall;1:170–178.
4.    Callaway LK, Prins JB, Chang AM, et al. The prevalence and impact of overweight and obesity in an Australian obstetric population. Med J Aust 2006;184:56–59.
5.    Bianco AT, Smilen SW, Davis Y, Lopez S, Lapinski R, Lockwood CJ. Pregnancy outcome and weight gain recommendations for the morbidly obese woman. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:97–102.
6.    Cedergren MI. Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:219–224.
7.    Vasudevan C, Renfrew M, McGuire W. Fetal and perinatal consequences of maternal obesity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011;96:F378–F382.
8.    Usha Kiran TS, Hemmadi S, Bethel J, Evans J. Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. BJOG 2005;112:768–772.
9.    Larsen TB, Sørensen HT, Gislum M, Johnsen SP, et al. Maternal smoking, obesity, and risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium: a population-based nested case-control study. Thromb Res 2007;120:505–509.
10.    Lashen H, Fear K, Sturdee DW. Obesity is associated with increased risk of first trimester and recurrent miscarriage: matched case-control study. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1644–1646.
11.    World Health Organization (WHO). BMI Classification. Geneva: WHO 2006. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/diseaseprevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi.
12.    Stothard KJ, Tennant PW, Bell R, Rankin J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009;301:636–650.
13.    Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R, Vohr BR. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics 2005;115:e290–296.
14.     Catalano PM, Shankar K. Obesity and pregnancy: mechanisms of short term and long term adverse consequences for mother and child. BMJ 2017;356:j1.
15.    Bellver J, Martínez-Conejero JA, Labarta E, et al. Endometrial gene expression in the window of implantation is altered in obese women especially in association with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2011;95:2335-2341.
16.    Lassance L, Haghiac M, Leahy P, et al. Identification of early transcriptome signatures in placenta exposed to insulin and obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:647.e1–e11.
17.    Maxwell C, Gaudet L, Cassir G, et al. Guideline No. 391-Pregnancy and Maternal Obesity Part 1: Pre-conception and Prenatal Care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019;41:1623–1640.
18.    Galazis N, Docheva N, Simillis C, Nicolaides KH. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;181:45–53.
19.    Lindsay CA, Huston L, Amini SB, Catalano PM. Longitudinal changes in the relationship between body mass index and percent body fat in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:377–382.
20.    Chiswick C, Reynolds RM, Denison F, et al. Effect of metformin on maternal and fetal outcomes in obese pregnant women (EMPOWaR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:778–786.
21.    Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH, Balani J, et al. Metformin versus placebo in obese pregnant women without diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2016;374:434–443.
22.    Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AY. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.
23.    Mottola MF, Giroux I, Gratton R, et al. Nutrition and exercise prevent excess weight gain in overweight pregnant women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42:265–272.
24.    Swank ML, Marshall NE, Caughey AB, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in the super obese, stratified by weight gain above and below institute of medicine guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:1105–1110.
25.    Ee TX, Allen JCA Jr, Malhotra R, Koh H, Østbye T, Tan TC. Determining optimal gestational weight gain in a multiethnic Asian population. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40:1002–1008.
26.    Barakat R, Pelaez M, Cordero Y, et al. Exercise during pregnancy protects against hypertension and macrosomia: randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:649.e1–e8.
27.    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Care of Women with Obesity in Pregnancy. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 72. 2018. Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg72/. Accessed 18 July 2020.
28.    Louis JM, Mogos MF, Salemi JL, Redline S, Salihu HM. Obstructive sleep apnea and severe maternal-infant morbidity/mortality in the United States, 1998-2009. Sleep 2014;37:843–849.
29.    Roberge S, Giguère Y, Villa P, et al. Early administration of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of severe and mild preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol 2014;31:e3.
30.    Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2017;377: 613–622.
31.    Harper LM, Jauk V, Longo S, Biggio JR, Szychowski JM, Tita AT. Early gestational diabetes screening in obese women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222:495.e1-495.e8.
32.    Santamaria A, Di Benedetto A, Petrella E, et al. Myo-inositol may prevent gestational diabetes onset in overweight women: a randomized, controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:3234–3237.
33.     Hildebrand E, Källén B, Josefsson A, Gottvall T, Blomberg M, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of Down syndrome in the offspring. Prenat Diagn 2014;34:310–315.
34.     Ashoor G, Syngelaki A, Poon L, Rezende JC, Nicolaides KH. Fetal fraction in maternal plasma cell-free DNA at 11-13 weeks’ gestation: relation to maternal and fetal characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:26–32.
35.    Benacerraf B. The use of obstetrical ultrasound in the obese gravida. Semin Perinatol 2013;37:345–347.
36.    Bak GS, Sperling L, Källén K, Salvesen KÅ, et al. Prospective population-based cohort study of maternal obesity as a source of error in gestational age estimation at 11-14 weeks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016;95:1281–1287.
37.    ACOG practice bulletin no. 156: obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:e112–e126.
38.    Kim YH, Lee HJ, Shin JE, et al. The predictive value of the uterine artery pulsatility index during the early third trimester for the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes depending on the maternal obesity. Obes Res Clin Pract 2015;9:374–381.
39.    Ciobanu A, Wright A, Syngelaki A, Wright D, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Fetal Medicine Foundation reference ranges for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;53:465–472.
40.     Brocato B, Lewis D, Mulekar M, Baker S, et al. Obesity’s impact on intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019;32:92–94.
41.     Yao R, Park BY, Foster SE,  Caughey AB, et al. The association between gestational weight gain and risk of stillbirth: a population-based cohort study. Ann Epidemiol 2017;27:638−644.e1.
42.    Gibbs Pickens CM, Kramer MR, Howards PP, et al. Term elective induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes among obese women and their offspring. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:12–22.
43.    Pevzner L, Powers BL, Rayburn WF, et al. Effects of maternal obesity on duration and outcomes of prostaglandin cervical ripening and labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1315–1321.
44.    Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:1175–1182.
45.    Carlhäll S, Källén K, Blomberg M. Maternal body mass index and duration of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;171:49–53.
46.    Zhang C, Wu Y, Li S, Zhang D, et al. Maternal prepregnancy obesity and the risk of shoulder dystocia: a meta-analysis. BJOG 2018;125:407–413.
47.    Cosson E, Cussac-Pillegand C, Benbara A, et al. Pregnancy adverse outcomes related to pregravid body mass index and gestational weight gain, according to the presence or not of gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study. Diabetes Metab 2016;42:38–46.
48.    Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Gurung T, Smith WC, Bhattacharya S. Obesity as an independent risk factor for elective and emergency caesarean delivery in nulliparous women—Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Obes Rev 2009;10:28–35.
49.    Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol2006;108:125–133.
50.    Pulman KJ, Tohidi M, Pudwell J, Davies GA, et al. Emergency Caesarean section in obese parturients: is a 30-minute decision-to-incision interval feasible? J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015;37:988–994.
51.    Machado LS. Cesarean section in morbidly obese parturients: practical implications and complications. N Am J Med Sci 2012;4:13–18.
52.    Väänänen AJ, Kainu JP, Eriksson H, Lång M, Tekay A, Sarvela J, et al. Does obesity complicate regional anesthesia and result in longer decision to delivery time for emergency cesarean section? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2017;61:609–618.
53.    Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology 2016;124:270–300.
54.    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Reducing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism during Pregnancy and the Puerperium. RCOG Green-top Guidelines No. 37a 2015. Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg-37a.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2020.
55.    Garcia AH, Voortman T, Baena CP, et al. Maternal weight status, diet, and supplement use as determinants of breastfeeding and complementary feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev 2016;74:490–516.
56.    Chuang CH, Chase GA, Bensyl DM, Weisman CS, et al. Contraceptive use by diabetic and obese women. Womens Health Issues 2005;15:167–173.
57.    Maclean CC, Thompson IS. Postpartum Care and Contraception in Obese Women. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016;59:204–215.
58.    Sahrakorpi N, Koivusalo SB, Stach-Lempinen B, et al. “The burden of pregnancy”; heavier for the heaviest? The changes in health related quality of life (HRQoL) assessed by the 15D instrument during pregnancy and postpartum in different body mass index groups: a longitudinal survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017;96:352–358.

Resources

 JPOG 202012 CME HK

JPOG 202012 CME HK

 JPOG 202012 CME HK

JPOG 202012 CME HK