The use of apremilast consistently reduced the number and pain due to oral ulcers in both men and women with active Behçet’s syndrome, according to a subgroup analysis of the RELIEF* study presented at EULAR 2021.
This analysis involved 80 men (mean age 38.7 years) and 127 women (mean age 40.8 years) with ≥2 oral ulcers associated with active Behçet’s syndrome, with no active major organ involvement. Participants were randomized to receive either apremilast 30 mg twice daily (men, n=40; women, n=64) or placebo (men, n=40; women, n=63) during a 12-week double-blind treatment period. The area under the curve for the number of oral ulcers from baseline to week 12 (AUCWk0-12) was used to assess the continued efficacy of apremilast. [EULAR 2021, abstract POS0828]
At week 12, a greater reduction in the number of oral ulcers, as shown by a lower AUCWk0-12, occurred with apremilast vs placebo in both men (118.9 vs 211.4, treatment difference, -92.5; p<0.001) and women (134.3 vs 229.2, treatment difference, -94.9; p<0.001).
Patients treated with apremilast also experienced a greater reduction in pain scores at week 12, as indicated by a reduction in VAS** score, compared with placebo (least squares [LS] mean change from baseline, -37.6 vs -12.0; p<0.0001 in men and -41.5 vs -17.4; p<0.0001 in women).
Moreover, a higher percentage of patients on apremilast than placebo achieved complete response by week 6 and remained oral ulcer-free for an additional ≥6 weeks (25.0 percent vs 2.5 percent; p=0.0033 in men and 32.8 percent vs 6.3 percent; p=0.0002 in women).
Apremilast recipients also demonstrated lesser disease activity, as shown by a greater reduction in BSAS***, compared with placebo recipients (LS mean change from baseline, -14.4 vs -1.3 [men] and -19.7 vs -7.7 [women]; p≤0.0001 for both).
Those on apremilast, particularly in women, also achieved a better quality of life (QoL) at week 12 than those on placebo (BDQoL+ score; -4.4 vs -0.3; p=0.0002).
“[Overall, both men and women showed consistent] improvements in [all] additional efficacy measures … and [had] similar safety profiles and adverse events that were consistent with [the] known safety profile [of apremilast],” said lead author Dr Gülen Hatemi from Istanbul University–Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical School, and Behçet’s Disease Research Center in Istanbul, Turkey.
“[Our findings showed] consistent treatment effects favour[ing] apremilast … in efficacy outcomes, including [the number and pain due to] oral ulcers, complete response, disease activity measures, and QoL in men and women with Behçet’s syndrome,” Hatemi concluded.
“[The] data support [the use of] apremilast as an effective treatment for men and women with Behçet’s syndrome,” she added.
*RELIEF: A phase 3 randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast (CC-10004) in subjects with active Behçet's disease
**VAS: Visual Analog Scale
***BSAS: Behçet’s Syndrome Activity Score
+BDQoL: Behçet’s Disease Quality of Life