Zuranolone improves depressive symptoms in postpartum depression

07 Jul 2021
Dr Margaret Shi
Dr Margaret Shi
Dr Margaret Shi
Dr Margaret Shi
Zuranolone improves depressive symptoms in postpartum depression

Results of a recent study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of zuranolone in improving core symptoms of depression in women with postpartum depression (PPD). 

“In the study, zuranolone showed rapid [by day 3], sustained [all measured time points through day 45], and clinically meaningful improvements in depressive symptoms, anxiety, and global and maternal functioning, and was generally well tolerated,” said the authors. [JAMA Psychiatry 2021;doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1559]

“We believe that zuranolone has the potential to become a novel treatment for patients with PPD. Our study’s findings, along with other PPD studies, support future research on the development and therapeutic use of neuroactive steroid [NAS] γ-aminobutyric acid receptor [GABAAR] positive allosteric modulator [PAM] in treatment of PPD,” they suggested.

In the study, 153 women (mean age, 28.3 years) 6 months postpartum with PPD (defined as major depressive episode beginning in the 3rd trimester or 4 weeks postdelivery) and baseline 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) score of 26 were enrolled from 27 study centres in the US between January 2017 and December 2018. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either zuranolone 30 mg administered orally each evening for 2 weeks, or placebo of equivalent dose and regimen.

Zuranolone demonstrated significant improvement in baseline HAMD-17 score at day 15 compared with placebo (-17.8 vs -13.6; difference, -4.2; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], -6.9 to -1.5; p=0.003).

Sustained improvement in baseline HAMD-17 score with zuranolone from day 3 through day 45, 4 weeks after treatment cessation, was observed (day 3, least-squares means difference, −2.7; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], -5.1 to -0.3; p=0.03; day 45, least-squares means difference, -4.1; 95 percent CI, -6.7 to -1.4; p=0.003).

Likewise, sustained differences at day 15 with zuranolone vs placebo were observed in HAMD-17 response (72 percent vs 48 percent; odds ratio [OR], 2.63; 95 percent Cl, 1.34 to 5.16; p=0.005), HAMD-17 score remission (45 percent vs 23 percent; OR, 2.53; 95 percent CI, 1.24 to 5.17; p=0.01), change from baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score (least-squares means difference, -4.6; 95 percent CI, -8.3 to -0.8; p=0.02), Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety score (least-squares means difference, -3.9; 95 percent CI, -6.7 to -1.1; p=0.006), and Clinical Global Impression Improvement response rate (72 percent vs 52 percent; OR, 2.2; 95 percent CI, 1.1 to 4.3; p=0.03).

Zuranolone was generally well tolerated. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) in the zuranolone group were somnolence (15 percent), headache (9 percent), dizziness (8 percent) and upper respiratory tract infection (8 percent). One patient per group experienced a serious AE (confusional state in the zuranolone group and pancreatitis in the placebo group). One patient in the zuranolone group discontinued treatment due to AE vs none for placebo.