Diabetes
mellitus continues to threaten millions of lives worldwide. As we move forward
from the aftermath of the pandemic, there is a renewed commitment to address
this threat globally. In fact, this year’s theme for world diabetes day
revolves around improving diabetes awareness and education among healthcare
workers.
ZP
Therapeutics joins this global call to action against diabetes thru the Asian
Diabetes Xchange Summit, a series of scientific events conducted throughout
Asia, with the aim of delivering the latest updates on diabetes management and
technology.
The
final leg of this series - the Asian Diabetes Xchange (ADX) Summit Philippines
- was held last November 11-12, 2022 at the Bellevue Manila, Muntinlupa,
Philippines. Working in collaboration with the relevant medical societies, ZP
Therapeutics engaged physicians at the frontline of diabetes diagnosis and
management.
In
the traditional ZP Therapeutics fashion, the scientific event brought together
leading experts and key opinion leaders to deliver these latest updates and
initiate important discussions on issues of diabetes management in the local
context.
Among
the speakers was Professor Esteban Jodar, Head of the Endocrinology Department at
University Hospitals at Quiron Salud
Madrid. He was joined by a panel of key opinion leaders for a multidisciplinary
discussion on diabetes care beyond glucose. The said panel was composed of Dr
Sjoberg Kho (endocrinology), Dr Rima Tan (diabetology), Dr Christopher Nazal
(cardiology), and Dr Lynn Gomez (nephrology). The plenaries for the first day
were moderated by Dr Cynthia Manabat, the chief of the section of
Endocrinology at the University of Perpetual Help Medical Center - Las Piñas.
Clinical Inertia, Early Initiation
of GLP1-RAs and Holistic Diabetic Care
During
the first day of the summit, Professor Jodar delivered a lecture tackling the impact
of early initiation of GLP1-RAs in patients with diabetes and reiterated
important points regarding the course of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
First, T2DM is known to have a progressive course, marked by the eventual
development of micro and macrovascular complications that at times begin even
prior to the diagnosis being made.
1
Second, glycemic control has been shown to deteriorate over time, which
necessitates progressive intensification of individualized therapy.
2 At present, many pharmacologic agents
can be added to current therapy to help achieve and maintain glycemic targets
in patients with T2DM. This then begs the question: which among the available
repertoire of anti-DM medications should be added to therapy?
In
reviewing the pathophysiology of T2DM, Professor Jodar enumerated the 12 pathophysiological
defects that contribute to beta cell failure in T2DM to demonstrate the
pervasive impact of the disease.
3 He
further points out how injectable GLP1- receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) address
each of these pathological defects.
3
Unfortunately,
despite the multitude of available pharmacologic treatments, the achievement of
glycemic control in some adults remains suboptimal.
4 According to Professor Jodar, an
important factor for such predicaments is clinical inertia which is a
multifaceted problem in clinical practice worldwide. He further expounds on
clinical inertia as a lack of adherence to guideline recommendations, or
simply, the failure to advance therapy when required.
4,5
Although
clinical inertia may be encountered in any phase of T2DM management, this is
most apparent when patients are only initiated with injectable therapy after
years of poor glycemic control,
6
despite the availability of clinical trials demonstrating the effectiveness and
simplicity of adding injectable therapy to treatment regimens. In fact, a study
by Lin et al. showed a significant prevalence (73%) of clinical inertia in the
management of T2DM.
7 As such, clinical inertia contributes
heavily to poor glycemic control, and results in the delay of effective
intensification of therapy. This would then translate to an increased risk of
microvascular
8 and macrovascular
9 events as well as suboptimal glycemic
control in the long term.
10
In
his lecture, Professor Jodar
recapitulates that overcoming clinical inertia by initiating early
intensification with appropriate therapeutic agents is central to preventing
long-term T2DM complications. He further elucidates the role of GLP1-RAs in
T2DM management and that equally important is the suitable timing of its
initiation. In revisiting the latest European Association for the Study of
Diabetes (EASD)/American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines, he points out
that GLP1- RAs should be considered and even initiated prior to Insulin in
patient with T2DM.
11 Among the available GLP1- RAs, real
world data on change in HbA1c and weight loss has been shown to favor
Dulaglutide.
12 Likewise, the PREFER study also
demonstrated a patient preference for Dulaglutide injection devices over those
of Semaglutide.
13 This is further supported by data
showing greater persistent use of Dulaglutide compared to Semaglutide and
Exenatide.
14
Following
Professor Jodar's
lecture, he was joined by the previously mentioned panelists and key opinion
leaders for a multidisciplinary discussion on diabetes care beyond glucose.
They discussed other facets of diabetes care by reiterating guideline
recommendations for glycemic targets, intensification, and de-escalation
strategies. They also mentioned special considerations for elderly patients
with diabetes and those with concomitant kidney diseases.
Cardiovascular Event Prevention in
Diabetes and Injectable Solutions for T2DM
Professor
Jodar
returned for the 2nd day of the summit to deliver another lecture on the impact
of glycemic control on cardiovascular event prevention for patients with
diabetes. In this plenary, Professor Jodar reviewed the existing evidence that
demonstrates the strong correlation between T2DM and cardiovascular diseases
such as myocardial infarction, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
15 These findings have introduced
large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) that have since transformed
the landscape of T2DM management.
Professor
Jodar
referred to the meta-analysis by Fei et al., which exemplified the
cardiovascular benefit afforded by SGLT-2 inhibitors as well as GLP-1 RAs.
16 These are reflected in the recent
guidelines on T2DM management published by the EASD and ADA which recommend the
preferential use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs for patients with diabetes
who possess multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
11
In
the context of injectable therapy, GLP1-RAs were likewise demonstrated to
result in better glycemic control when compared to Insulin,
17 with added benefits regarding body
weight, hypoglycemia, blood pressure, and lipoproteins. Comparing the different
GLP1-RAs, Dulaglutide has been demonstrated to have a greater reduction in
HbA1c and body weight versus Liraglutide,
12 and
is preferred by patients over Semaglutide,
13
resulting to lower discontinuation rates. Moreover, HbA1c reduction has been
observed as early as 3 months upon initiation of therapy and persisted through
24 months, as demonstrated in the real-world study by Mody et
al.
14
This
lecture was followed by another multidisciplinary discussion on the utility of
injectable therapy in the Philippines. In this final plenary of the ADX summit,
Dr Caprice Yang - a practicing endocrinologist from Pagadian Doctor’s Hospital
- joined Dr Rima Tan and Dr Christopher Nazal in sharing their own experiences with
real-world patients to illustrate important considerations on individualized
therapy with injectable solutions for T2DM.
ADX Summit: Elevating Diabetes Care
The
Asian Diabetes Xchange Summit, which is being projected to become a yearly
event, is a testament to the commitment of ZP Therapeutics to remain as
forerunners in
the global effort to address the impact of diabetes worldwide and achieve
excellence by elevating the quality of diabetes care while improving patient
access in the Philippines.
References:
1. Kendall DM, et al. Am J
Med 2009;122:S37–50.
2. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet
1998;352:854–65.
3. Ahmad E, et al. Lancet 2022;400:1803–1820.
4. Khunti K,
et al. Diabetes Care 2013;36:3411–7.
5. Khunti K, etal. Prim Care Diabetes 2017;11:105–106.
6. Khunti S,
et al. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis
2015;15:65–69
7. Lin J, et al. Endo Pract 2016;22:151–161.
8. Osataphan S,
et al. J Diabetes 2017;9:267–274.
9. Paul SK, et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol
2015;14:100.
10. Mauricio D, et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2017;19:1155–1164.
11. Davies MJ, et al.
Diabetes Care 1 2022;45:2753–2786.
12. Morieri ML, et al. Metabolism 2020;106:154–190.
13. Matza LS, et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020;22:355–364.
14. Mody R,
et al. Diabetes Obes Metab
2021;23:106–115.
15. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Lancet
2010;375:2215–22.
16. Fei Y, et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2019;18:112
17. Gorgojo et al. Med Clin (Barc) 2016;147 (Sup1): 8-16