The knowledge regarding diabetes
mellitus and its management has grown significantly over the past few years,
driven by its continuing clinical relevance and its burden on patients and
their families globally. Greater awareness of the different aspects of this
disease led to a better understanding of its complications and their impact on a
patient’s quality of life. As a result, the focus and goals of diabetes
management have seen significant changes over the past few years, which are
anchored on new and emerging evidence. Fortunately, newer pharmacologic agents
which address these goals are now available.
In a recent event held by Zuellig
Pharma Therapeutics, in partnership with the Philippine Academy of Family
Physicians and the Institute for Studies on Diabetes Foundation Inc., entitled Leaps
and Bounds: Improving Patient Outcomes Through Advances in Diabetes Mellitus
Management, the benefits of Dulaglutide (Trulicity), a long-acting glucagon-like
peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) in achieving these new goals in the
management of diabetes mellitus was discussed.
Dr Rima Tandico Tan – a senior
faculty at the UERMMMC Institute for Studies on Diabetes Foundation Inc.
(ISDFI) and the past president of Diabetes Philippines and the Philippine
Society of Diabetologists - led the discussion. She was joined by Dr Limuel
Anthony Abrogena, the national director of the Philippine Academy of Family
Physicians, as well as Dr Leilani A. Baldeviso, who gave her reaction on behalf
of the UERMMMC ISDFI.
Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Risk
Dr Rima Tan started her discussion by illustrating that patients
with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are two to four times more likely to
develop cardiovascular diseases (CVD) compared to those without T2DM.
1 In fact, these increased CVD risks start even before the diagnosis of T2DM is
made.
2 A significant proportion of patients with T2DM have a
significant history of CVD such as stroke or heart attack, although a majority
of the general T2DM population does not have a history of CVD but possesses multiple
risk factors for such.
3
A Broader Focus in Diabetes Management: Updated
guidelines and recommendations
Glycemic control and HbA1c reduction have been clearly
demonstrated to be important in reducing the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events
in patients with T2DM, as such, management of T2DM in the past focused on
glycemic control. However, according to Dr Tan, the focus of T2DM management
has now moved on to consider CV benefit, renal outcomes, and ultimately,
long-term survival. Dr Tan further reiterates that this more comprehensive
approach includes the four pillars of glycemic management, namely: glycemic
management, blood pressure management, lipid management, and administration of
pharmacological agents with CV and renal benefits.
4
She also discussed in detail the most recent algorithm for
T2DM management which was published by the American Diabetes Association (ADA).
In the said recommendations, metformin coupled with lifestyle modification is
still the first step in T2DM management. However, these recent guidelines
recommend classifying patients into those with established atherosclerotic
cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), those with indicators of high-risk ASCVD, and
those without. As illustrated by Dr Tan, these guidelines dictate that for
patients with indicators for high-risk ASCVD, specific agents with CV benefits
such as GLP1RA and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are
strongly recommended.
4
These are also in line with the most recent recommendations
published by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the European
Society of Cardiology as well as those from the American College of Cardiology
and American Heart Association.
Similarly, the Philippine Heart Association recommends the
use of SGLT2i and GLP1RA, either alone or in combination to reduce major CV
Events.
Assessing the Evidence of Dulaglutide Benefit
Dr Rima Tan further reinforced the benefits of Dulaglutide
use by providing existing and recent evidence supporting its use. Multiple
studies have demonstrated that Dulaglutide provides significant improvement in
HbA1c control when administered on top of SGLT2i.
5 Considering their
mechanisms of action, it is apparent that SGLT2i and GLP1RA work
synergistically, accounting for the significant improvement of HbA1c which
translates to reduced CV risk and ultimately better patient outcomes.
6
Dr Tan also discussed the AWARD trials, a series of ten
trials where more than 6000 patients were enrolled and showed Dulaglutide in head-to-head
trials spanning the continuum of diabetes care. These studies collectively
demonstrated the powerful HbA1c reduction achieved with Dulaglutide use. In
these studies, 56% to 76% of patients who started on 1.5mg Dulaglutide achieved
their HbA1c target of less than 7%. Furthermore, this HbA1c reduction was shown
to be sustained for 104 weeks, which was the longest measuring point for the
studies.
Equally important were the findings of the AWARD 5 trial,
which compared Dulaglutide against Sitagliptin (a DPP4 inhibitor). The study
not only demonstrated the non-inferiority of Dulaglutide, but also showed
greater HbA1c reduction compared to Sitagliptin, and was sustained over 104
weeks.
7
Dulaglutide in primary and secondary prevention of CV
events
Because most patients with T2DM have no previous CVD but
have multiple risk factors, it is also relevant to assess the role of
Dulaglutide in the primary prevention of CVD aside from its role in secondary
prevention in patients with previous CVD. This evidence came with the
conclusion of the REWIND Study. Dr Rima Tan highlights that the REWIND study
differed from other cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT) in that only 31% of
enrolled patients had prior CVD, making the study population more
representative of the general T2DM population. Although these patients had no
prior CVD, they were noted to possess multiple CV risk factors at the start of
the trial. The results after 5.4 years of follow-up showed a 12% reduction in
CV events, which were a composite of non-fatal stroke, CV death, and non-fatal
myocardial infarction when dulaglutide was compared with standard therapy. This
divergence in CV risk was apparent within 1 year upon initiation of the study
and was magnified as the trial progressed.
8 This highlights the role
of Dulaglutide in the primary prevention of CV events for patients with T2DM
and multiple CV risk factors.
Injectable Therapy and Patient Preference
In her discussion, Dr Rima Tan acknowledged the hesitancy
among patients and even doctors in initiating injectable therapy for T2DM
management, either as part of intensifying existing therapy or to achieve
greater CV risk reduction. However, in a study assessing patient preference, it
was found that most patients (94%) preferred the use of a Dulaglutide
(Trulicity) pen and were willing to continue to use Dulaglutide (Trulicity)
pen.
9 This is essential to ensure compliance and to ensure that
these benefits will translate to better patient outcomes in the real world.
Summary
In conclusion of the discussion, Dulaglutide (Trulicity)
comes in a ready-to-use pen which has been shown to be preferred by patients.
Its once-weekly dosing allows for more convenient use, and more importantly,
causes little to no disruption of patients’ day-to-day activities. It has
superior HbA1c reduction and is the first and only GLP1 RA to demonstrate both
primary and secondary prevention of major adverse CV events, backed up by
recent and definitive evidence.
REFERENCES:
1. American
College of Cardiology. Heart Disease is the leading cause of death among adults
with diabetes. Diabetes and Your Heart | CardioSmart
– American College of Cardiology. Accessed 26 September 2019.
2. Sattar
N. Revisiting the links between glycaemia, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Diabetologia. 2013 Apr;56(4):686-95. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2817-5. Epub 2013
Jan 27. PMID: 23354123.
3. Einarson
TR, et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a
systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in
2007-2017. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Jun 8;17(1):83. doi:
10.1186/s12933-018-0728-6. PMID: 29884191; PMCID: PMC5994068.
4. American
Diabetes Association; Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022 Abridged for
Primary Care Providers. Clin Diabetes 1 January 2022; 40 (1): 10–38. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd22-as01
5. Ludvik
B, et al. Dulaglutide as add-on therapy to SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with
inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (AWARD-10): a 24-week, randomised,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018
May;6(5):370-381. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30023-8. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
6. Wilcox
T, et al. Diabetic Agents, From Metformin to SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP1 Receptor
Agonists: JACC Focus Seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 28;75(16):1956-1974.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.056.
7. Nauck
M, et al. Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 52 weeks
in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-5). Diabetes Care.
2014 Aug;37(8):2149-58. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2761. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
8. Gerstein
HC, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND):
a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Jul
13;394(10193):121-130. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
PMID: 31189511.
9. Matza
LS, et al. Assessing patient PREFERence between the dulaglutide pen and the
semaglutide pen: A crossover study (PREFER). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020
Mar;22(3):355-364. doi: 10.1111/dom.13902. Epub 2019 Dec 19. PMID: 31646727;
PMCID: PMC7064885.