Early gestational diabetes treatment modest at best in preventing adverse neonatal outcomes

09 Aug 2023
Early gestational diabetes treatment modest at best in preventing adverse neonatal outcomes

Treatment of gestational diabetes before 20 weeks’ gestation appears to lead to a modestly lower incidence of a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes as compared with no-immediate treatment, with no substantial differences noted for pregnancy-related hypertension or neonatal lean body mass, as reported in a study.

The study included 802 women between 4 weeks and 19 weeks and 6 days of gestation who had gestational diabetes and a risk factor for hyperglycaemia. These women were randomly assigned to receive immediate treatment for gestational diabetes (n=406) or deferred or no treatment (control, n=396). All participants underwent a repeat oral glucose-tolerance test [OGTT] at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation.

The primary outcomes were a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (birth at <37 weeks of gestation, birth trauma, birth weight of ≥4,500 g, respiratory distress, phototherapy, stillbirth or neonatal death, or shoulder dystocia), pregnancy-related hypertension (pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, or gestational hypertension), and neonatal lean body mass.

At a mean gestation of 15.6 weeks, the women underwent their initial OGTT. A lower proportion of women in the immediate-treatment group than in the control group had an adverse neonatal outcome event (24.9 percent vs 30.5 percent; adjusted risk difference, −5.6 percentage points, 95 percent confidence interval [CI], −10.1 to −1.2).

Meanwhile, there was no significant between-group difference in the other two outcomes. Pregnancy-related hypertension occurred in 10.6 percent of women in the immediate-treatment group and in 9.9 percent of those in the control group, with an adjusted risk difference of 0.7 percentage points (95 percent CI, −1.6 to 2.9).

The mean neonatal lean body mass was 2.86 kg in the immediate-treatment group and 2.91 kg in the control group, with adjusted mean difference of −0.04 kg (95 percent CI, −0.09 to 0.02).

The frequency of serious adverse events associated with screening and treatment was similar between the two groups.

N Engl J Med 2023;388:2132-2144