Population-based study: Chemo use and choice impact sarcoma survival

03 Oct 2019 bởiChristina Lau
Dr Herbert LoongDr Herbert Loong

The use and choice of chemotherapy significantly impact overall survival (OS) of patients with sarcoma, according to a population-based retrospective cohort study involving more than 3,000 patients treated in Hong Kong.

In the study, presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2019, researchers identified 3,746 patients with bone and/or soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) who attended clinics or hospitals of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority (HA) between January 2004 and March 2018. Data from 3,358 eligible patients (bone sarcoma, n=661; STS, n=2,576; both, n=121) with index presentation in or after January 2005 were analyzed to allow a 1-year window period. [Loong HH, et al, ESMO 2019, poster 1684P]

“This is one of the largest population-based real-world sarcoma cohorts,” noted first author Dr Herbert Loong of the Department of Clinical Oncology, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

In the cohort, 32.8 percent of patients (n=1,100) were prescribed chemotherapy. Compared with patients who had not received chemotherapy, patients who used chemotherapy had lower OS rates at 2–10 years. OS rates at 5 years and 10 years for patients who had never used vs those who used chemotherapy were 57.1 percent vs 34.5 percent and 49.3 percent vs 23.8 percent, respectively.

“These findings are in keeping with the common practice of reserving chemotherapy for patients with metastatic disease only, except in selected cases where the adjuvant use of cytotoxics is recommended,” commented Loong.  

“The apparently better OS in patients who had not received chemotherapy vs those who had is likely a reflection of the disease status and trends of chemotherapy prescription in these patients, and should not be regarded as lack of efficacy,” he advised.

Anthracyclines were the most commonly used class of chemotherapy (19.8 percent) during the study period. Compared with patients who had not received any chemotherapy, those who received chemotherapy other than anthracyclines had significantly increased risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.913) and cancer-specific mortality (HR, 2.067) (both p<0.001). When used as first-line treatment, anthracyclines were associated with smaller increases in all-cause mortality (HR, 1.413) and cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.585) (both p<0.001). The risk of cancer-specific mortality was greater in patients who had received chemotherapy other than  anthracyclines in the first line (HR, 1.814; p<0.001).

“One key limitation of our study is the inability to differentiate between patients who received chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment (albeit a small number) and those who received chemotherapy for treatment of metastatic disease. The intent of treatment was often not coded in the HA database,” said Loong.

The study also showed a positive effect of anthracyclines vs no chemotherapy on OS in patients with bone sarcoma in both the first-line and later-line settings (HR for all-cause mortality, 0.811 and 0.446, respectively; p<0.001). In contrast, those who had never received anthracyclines had a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality vs no chemotherapy (HR, 1.766; p<0.001).

“The impact of chemotherapy on mortality reduction appeared greater in bone sarcoma vs STS,” said the researchers.

Importantly, anthracycline use provided a significant reduction in mortality over non-anthracycline chemotherapy only within 3 months of the index diagnosis (p<0.001). This significance was not apparent in patients who started chemotherapy >3 months after diagnosis (p=0.14).

“Based on these findings, despite its toxicities, we believe that anthracyclines remain a cornerstone of treatment for patients with sarcoma and should be considered earlier,” Loong concluded.

The researchers also suggest a territory-wide disease-specific prospective registry to be established. “This can allow accurate collection of relevant clinical outcome data, which will be most helpful for further understanding of this group of rare but often deadly diseases,” Loong added.