Content on this page:
Content on this page:
Laboratory Tests and Ancillaries
Mutational
Analysis
Mutational analysis may be performed
when diagnosis is uncertain for mutations involving KIT and PDGFRA genes,
and testing for these genes is strongly recommended. It is recommended for
resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor with significant morbidity. Testing
for mutations is recommended prior to starting preoperative or neoadjuvant
therapy to ensure if the tumor has the genotype that is responsive to the
therapy. Mutational analysis predicts response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor
(TKI) therapy. The presence and the type of KIT or PDGFRA
mutation status can predict response to TKI therapy in patients with advanced
or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The presence of KIT exon
11 mutations is associated with better response rates, median progression-free
survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) than KIT exon 9
mutations or non-mutated KIT or PDGFRA.
Mutational analysis is also
recommended for unresectable primary disease. Genotyping
must be performed when medical treatment is planned as it helps in identifying
genotypes that will benefit from Imatinib therapy and the appropriate dose for
treatment of KIT exon 9 mutations. If KIT or PDGFRA mutations
are lacking, consider testing for germline mutations in the succinate dehydroÂgenase
(SDH) genes using next generation sequencing (NGS) or immunohistochemistry
(IHC). SDH mutations commonly arise in
the stomach of younger patients, frequently metastasize, may involve lymph
nodes, and usually grow slowly, and are usually resistant to Imatinib.
Other driver mutations
(eg v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog [BRAF], type I
neurofibromatosis [NF1], neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase [NTRK],
and EGFR fusions) may be detected using NGS to identify potential
targeted therapies. NF1-associated gastrointestinal stromal tumor
commonly arises in the small intestine, may be multifocal, and often have an
indolent behavior.
Diagnostic Approaches
For an esophagogastric or duodenal nodule with a
size of <2 cm, laparoscopic or laparotomic excision is considered for
histological diagnosis as endoscopic biopsy may be difficult. Rectal or
recto-vaginal space nodules are biopsied or excised regardless of tumor size as
the risk is high for a gastrointestinal tumor at this location. Laparoscopic or
laparotomic excision may be performed for abdominal nodules not amenable to
endoscopic assessment. Multiple core needle biopsies via endoscopic ultrasound
(EUS) guidance or through US or computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous
approach for a mass that is likely to have a multi-organ resection may be done.
For obvious metastases, a diagnostic biopsy of the metastases is sufficient and
may not need laparotomy.
Biopsy
Biopsy is necessary to confirm the diagnosis of gastrointestinal
stromal tumor before the initiation of preoperative therapy. EUS- guided
fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNAB) or EUS-guided core needle biopsy (EUS-CNB)
should be considered for very small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
<2 cm. High-risk pathological biopsy features include the presence of
mitoses and/or tumor necrosis.

Tissue Biopsy
Morphologic diagnosis from histological microscopic examination is the standard for diagnosis. The diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor is confirmed with a biopsy before starting preoperative therapy. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are soft and fragile and may cause hemorrhage and increased dissemination. The pseudocapsule should be preserved and tumor spillage avoided.
EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is preferred over percutaneous biopsy and may be done in gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a size of <2 cm. Endoscopic transmural biopsy is preferred over percutaneous transperitoneal biopsy. Percutaneous image-guided biopsy may be performed for the confirmation of locally advanced or metastatic disease.
Histopathology Summary
The histopathology summary should include the diagnosis comprising of the tumor type (ie spindle, epithelioid, or mixed), mitotic rate, presence or absence of necrosis, hemorrhage, and lymphovascular invasion, and the invaded structures, anatomic location, the size, and the mitotic rate (which is measured in the most proliferative area of the tumor). The immunohistochemistry result, KIT expression status, margin evaluation, and the recommendation on a multidisciplinary meeting should also be included. The prognostic category should also be included in the histopathology summary; the prognostic factors are as follows:
- Mitotic rate
- Tumor size and site
- Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a size of <2 cm are usually benign but colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a size of <2 cm with mitotic activity can recur and metastasize
- Small bowel or colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumors have an aggressive behavior compared with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
- Surgical margin
- Tumor rupture (has a highly adverse prognosis)
- May be based on clinical parameters such as size and anatomic location in the absence of mitotic rate
- Factors associated with poorer
disease-free survival (DES) include:
- Presence of KIT exon 9 duplication
- Presence of KIT exon 11 deletions
- Nongastric site
- Larger tumor size
- High mitotic index
- Presence of PDGFRA exon 18 mutations were associated with better prognosis
Imaging
Abdominal
or Pelvic Computed Tomography (CT) Scan With Contrast
Abdominal or pelvic CT with
contrast allows the assessment of the primary tumor and the extent of
metastasis. It is the investigation of choice for staging and follow-up. It is
the imaging of choice to evaluate the extent and presence or absence of
metastasis at the initial staging workup for biopsy-proven gastrointestinal
stromal tumor. For incidentally found mass on endoscopy, CT may be performed if
EUS is not available. It is also the initial imaging done for large palpable
masses or for patients presenting with hemorrhage, abdominal pain, or
obstruction. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors usually show an extraluminal mass
arising from the digestive tract wall. Lastly, it is the imaging option used to
assess response to preoperative TKI every 8-12 weeks.
Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (MRI)
An MRI gives better preoperative staging data
regarding rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. It may provide tumor
localization and show its relationship with adjacent organs. MRI can also be
used to assess response to preoperative TKI every 8-12 weeks.
Fluoro-deoxyglucose
Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET)
FDG-PET provides early neoplastic information and detects
metabolic changes within the tumor earlier than the visible changes. It is
beneficial in differentiating active tumor from necrotic or inactive scar
tissue, malignant from benign tissue, and recurrent tumor from nondescript
changes. It must be noted that a baseline must be performed first if it will be
used for follow-up. It may be used as part of the pre-operative assessment and to
assess responsiveness of the tumor after 2-4 weeks of preoperative TKI therapy.
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)
EUS is a standard diagnostic tool for patients with
esophagogastric or duodenal submucosal nodule <2 cm. It is the most useful
assessment of masses located in the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and
anorectum. The potential high-risk features that may be seen with an EUS
include cystic spaces, echogenic foci, heterogeneity, irregular border, and
ulceration.
Other Imaging
Other imaging modalities that may be requested are
endoscopy (if not yet done) and chest X-ray.